TradingKey - Salesforce is a leading provider of cloud-based Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software designed to help businesses optimize their interactions with customers, prospects, and partners. Serving as a digital hub, Salesforce unifies critical functions like sales, marketing, customer service, and analytics into one cohesive platform. For example, sales teams can track a lead’s journey from the first outreach to closing the deal, while marketing teams use data to create tailored campaigns.
Customers remain loyal to Salesforce because of its reliability, scalability, and extensive ecosystem, which includes integration with tools like Slack and Tableau. For large enterprises, years of accumulated customer data stored in Salesforce make switching to a competitor or building an in-house solution a daunting and costly task. High switching costs, both financial and operational, ensure companies remain committed to the platform.
AI is becoming the defining trend in SaaS, with many companies rushing to integrate generative AI and position themselves as “AI-powered.” However, the depth of AI adoption varies significantly. Many providers simply embed ChatGPT-like models into their platforms and market them as transformative innovations. Salesforce, on the other hand, is taking a distinct approach with its Einstein GPT offering—a generative AI layer embedded directly into its CRM platform.
Einstein GPT combines both public and private AI models with Salesforce’s locally stored CRM data to generate personalized and adaptive content. This includes features like auto-drafting emails, predicting customer needs, and curating recommendations, all within Salesforce’s ecosystem. Users don’t need to leave the platform to harness these capabilities, which enhances efficiency and workflow continuity.
Despite these advancements, questions remain about how groundbreaking this approach truly is. Einstein GPT leverages underlying capabilities from ChatGPT and other third-party AI technologies, meaning Salesforce isn’t developing AI models entirely from scratch. Instead, it’s integrating these technologies into its ecosystem. While this enhances productivity and saves sales teams hours of manual work, it raises concerns about how much of Salesforce's AI offering is proprietary versus borrowed from external tech providers.
Salesforce’s AI strategy focuses on the “front office,” where customer interactions take place. Einstein GPT powers applications across sales (lead scoring), service (automated chatbot responses), marketing (personalized campaigns), and Slack (summarizing conversations). With over 150,000 clients and extensive CRM datasets, Salesforce has a strong foundation for AI commercialization. However, the adoption of these features remains uncertain— how many clients actually use these AI features versus sticking to basic CRM? Existing users are already very proficient with the old tools and may only dabble in AI features, reinforcing inertia.
Source: Salesforce
Salesforce’s strength lies in its deeply rooted position among large enterprises. Long-term contracts and the high costs of migrating to alternative platforms make switching difficult and risky. Executives, driven by short-term priorities, rarely push for such upheavals, ensuring Salesforce’s continued dominance.
However, this reliance also creates opportunities for disruption. AI-native startups, free from legacy constraints, could challenge Salesforce with simpler, more affordable solutions. While Salesforce’s AI initiatives, such as Einstein GPT, aim to fend off these threats, its size and complexity may limit its ability to adapt as quickly as smaller, more agile competitors.
If AI becomes powerful enough to replace workers, it might also replace tools like Salesforce. Imagine an AI that listens to sales calls, logs data, and builds custom apps—all without a CRM middleman. Companies could bypass Salesforce by integrating AI directly with their product data, a cheaper and more flexible alternative. Klarna’s move to replace Salesforce with AI-built solutions is an early warning shot. Companies are lying off more workers with AI implementation. Fewer employees mean less SaaS demand. Salesforce’s seat-based revenue model, billing based on the number of people using its platform, faces real risk if AI eliminates the humans using those seats. SaaS thrives on upselling: convince clients to buy more seats or add-ons (like AI agents) to save labor costs. However, as AI makes coding more accessible and affordable, companies may begin to question Salesforce’s value. Why pay $150 per user/month when an in-house AI-powered app could deliver similar results at a lower cost? Even if Salesforce nails AI integration, competition could erode pricing power, turning its premium offering into a commodity.
AI has the potential to disrupt the traditional CRM model at multiple levels:
Salesforce is responding to these threats with its Agentforce initiative, which embeds AI agents across its platform. CEO Marc Benioff has described Agentforce as a groundbreaking step that leverages a decade of AI investment to provide proactive solutions like automated customer support and predictive sales recommendations. These agents could proactively resolve customer issues or upsell products, boosting client ROI and justifying higher fees. If successful, Agentforce could strengthen Salesforce’s competitive moat, making the platform indispensable in an AI-driven world.
Source: Company Financials, Tradingkey.com
Source: Company Financials, Tradingkey.com
Source: Company Financials, Tradingkey.com
Source: Company Financials, Tradingkey.com
Source: Company Financials, Tradingkey.com
Source: Company Financials, Tradingkey.com
We evaluate Salesforce using the EV/Forward Revenue multiple. With forward revenue at $40,070M and an enterprise value of $272,932M, its current multiple is 6.8x, compared to a peer median of 9.1x. Given Salesforce’s 8.7% growth, which lags ServiceNow (22.4%) and slightly exceeds Oracle (6.4%), its low growth rate suggests a more conservative valuation. We adjust to a 6.5x-7.5x target range, reflecting the modest growth and slowing cRPO.
Applying this to $40,070M yields a target EV of $260,455M-300,525M. Using forecasted FY2026 net cash of $2,354M, equity value ranges from $262,809M to $302,879M, translating to a target price of $273-$315 per share.
Source: Company Financials, Tradingkey.com
Salesforce faces a pivotal moment as the SaaS industry transitions to an AI world. The company’s strengths,150,000 clients, a deeply entrenched platform, and a decade of AI investment, position it well to capitalize on AI opportunities. However, risks loom: AI could reduce seat demand, commoditize offerings, or allow agile competitors to outflank Salesforce.
Investors should monitor the next few quarters’ results for early signs of Agentforce adoption and AI-driven growth. If Salesforce can demonstrate double-digit growth and maintain margins, it will reinforce its market leadership. Otherwise, the risks of commoditization may begin to overshadow its strengths.